Micro units → macro volatility
How do heterogeneous firm shocks become aggregate fluctuations?
Weights, marginal volatility, dependence, and population paths jointly determine diversification.
Explore aggregation and volatility →Matías Iglesias · Research portal
I study how economic objects change when heterogeneous units are weighted, normalized, grouped, and represented in space.
Current research front
Two systems can have the same concentration path and different rates of diversification.
Direct economic weights describe concentration. Aggregate-variance scaling depends on the complete population-indexed stochastic exposure: marginal variances, dependence, composition, and the path along which the population changes. The current manuscript turns that distinction into an exact finite-interval accounting result.
A level property of weights is not, by itself, an elasticity of a variance–covariance system.
One programme, three transformations
It helps create the quantities we later interpret as volatility, specialization, and economic relatedness.
How do heterogeneous firm shocks become aggregate fluctuations?
Weights, marginal volatility, dependence, and population paths jointly determine diversification.
Explore aggregation and volatility →When does normalization change the meaning of revealed advantage?
Observation size can distort a familiar index and motivate a probability-based alternative.
Explore location quotients and pLQ →How do geographic support and representation shape measured relatedness?
Boundaries, distance, normalization, and transformations help define the network being measured.
Explore correlation structures →Published foundation
An identical LQ value can represent a different distance from specialization for observations of different sizes.
The location-quotient programme shows how row, column, observation, and table size shape the distribution and persistence of a familiar economic index. The probabilistic location quotient then replaces a brittle threshold with a size-conditional transition probability.
Spatial antecedent
Administrative areas are not passive containers: their scale and geometry help determine the relationship represented by a co-location measure.
The geography programme treats similarity matrices as locational correlation structures. It then asks how discrete areas, continuous distance, normalization, and input transformation change the industry network we claim to observe.
Ideas recovered from the thesis
These are antecedents and options, not six simultaneous active projects. The current publication sequence remains anchored in the aggregation programme.
Aggregation can make fluctuations approximately linear even when firm-level dynamics remain strongly nonlinear.
Follow the micro-to-macro trail →The number of firms, their weights, marginal volatility, and dependence are distinct economic objects.
See what controls diversification →Observation size changes the economic meaning of an identical location-quotient value.
Read the location-quotient result →The probabilistic location quotient reframes specialization as a size-conditional transition probability.
Understand pLQ →Counts, logs, normalizations, and binary specialization can generate different economic networks.
Inspect the similarity framework →Administrative areas are not passive containers: their geometry helps define measured spatial overlap.
Trace areas into continuous space →Research status
The portal distinguishes current manuscripts, published work, working papers, thesis results, and research directions.
Research archive, not a frozen thesis
Start with the present programme, choose a curated reading trail, and move from a research proposition into the original derivations, figures, data arguments, and technical material.