Skip to main content

Firm Level Fluctuations

Firm Level Fluctuations

If firm sales are expressed in logs, it is natural to describe their dynamics as changes in log levels. Figure 1 illustrates the observed distribution of year-on-year log differences. The plots depict growth rates for:

  • The smallest firms concentrating up to 25% of the value
  • Intermediate size firms accounting for the next 25% of sold value
  • The largest firms concentrating 50% of the value

Results for exports and imports largely overlap in each of the plots. The scale is log-log, so that:

  • A double exponential (Laplace) distribution would appear as x\sim -|x|
  • Normally distributed log shocks would appear as x2\sim - x^2
  • For large firms, we observe xc\sim -|x|^c with 0<c<10 < c < 1

We see nearly symmetric fluctuations.

Fluctuations as log difference from previous period. Small (left) medium (mid) and large (right) firms. Exports and imports data are mostly overlapping. Vertical gray lines show smallest shocks accounting for half of the growth and half of the shrinkage. Fat tails are important but small log-normally distributed shocks are also present and account for a significant part of fluctuations.

Very importantly, when computing total sales by firms kk at time tt, we need to consider the terms in Skt\sum S_{kt}. This can be reconstructed by knowing the initial value Sk0S_{k0} and accumulating the log shocks up to tt. This method is known as the growth rates accumulation approach. However, reconstructing the time series of levels of a firm solely from the general distribution of log differences would be a mistake because it ignores existing autocorrelation structures. In most empirical settings, there is a mild negative one-step autocorrelation of log shocks, meaning growth events are more likely followed by shrinkage events and vice versa.

To avoid these complications, we can express the information of firm sales levels as deviations from a stationary (or average) value. In this case, we do not need to accumulate a time series of log growth rates anymore. This is observed directly from the empirical data (Figure 2). Deriving analytical expressions for these distributions is not straightforward, but unnecessary.

Fluctuations from mean D(\cdot). Small (left) medium (mid) and large (right) firms. Exports and imports data are mostly overlapping. Vertical gray lines show smallest shocks accounting for half of the growth and half of the shrinkage. These fluctuations acknowledge accumulation of successive growth rates and they are to be used directly in accounting.

The values illustrated in Figure 2 are termed fluctuations, distinguishing them from log jumps shown by agents (as in growth rates). Consider these distributions (D(.)D(.)) as the large numbers limit distribution of deviations of a firm from its average value sˉ\bar s. To sum the value sold by this firm over time, one would need to sum the values sˉ10D(.)\bar s 10^{D(.)}. Similarly, if D(.)D(.) is the limit distribution of deviations for a population of firms at any given time step from their mean sˉ\bar s, then summing sˉ10D(.)\bar s 10^{D(.)} gives total sales at each time step.

Expressing the information on firm levels over time as fluctuations has a dual advantage: it avoids the problem of accumulation of autocorrelated time series and their powers are exactly what one needs to sum to obtain aggregates.

The most important feature of firm-level fluctuations is their natural adaptation to a description of the type 10D(.)10^{D(.)}, where D()D(\cdot) is usually a mixture of Gaussians. This characteristic is crucial as it determines the formal path for aggregating them.