Skip to main content

Analysis of Log Quantile Levels

Understanding Log Quantile Levels

To analyze the behavior of log(Sq/S0)log(S_q/S_0), we utilize the relationship between the expectation of a random variable and its log level. When fluctuations in the quantile part are not excessively large, the approximation E[log(sD)]log(E[sD])E[\log(s^*_{D})] \approx \log(E[s^*_{D}]) holds. By substituting this into the relevant equations, we derive:

  • For log-normal shocks: E[log(sN)]log(MN)=μ+σ^2ln(10)2E[\log(s^*_{N})] \approx \log(M_N) = \mu + \frac{\hat \sigma^2 \ln(10)}{2}

  • For log-Laplace shocks: E[log(sL)]log(ML)=μ+log(1112σ^2ln2(10))E[\log(s^*_{L})] \approx \log(M_L) = \mu + \log \left( \frac{1}{1 - \frac{1}{2} \hat \sigma^2 \ln^2(10)} \right)

When nqn_q is sufficiently large, log(Sq/S0)log(MD)log(S_q/S_0) \approx log(M_D). In the limit of small σ^\hat \sigma, the expression simplifies to:

log(ML)μ+12σ^2ln(10)+18ln3(10)σ^4+O(σ^6)\log(M_L) \approx \mu + \frac{1}{2} \hat \sigma^2 \ln(10) + \frac{1}{8} \ln^3(10) \hat \sigma^4 + O(\hat \sigma^6)

This indicates a common dependence for both log-normal and log-Laplace fluctuations: log(Sqt/S0)=μ+σ^2ln(10)2log(S_{qt}/S_0) = \mu + \frac{\hat \sigma^2 \ln(10)}{2}.

Quantile Mean Level Expressions

The expressions for quantile mean level (Eqs. for ENE_N and ELE_L) and log level (Eqs. for ElogNElog_N and ElogLElog_L) are based on the parameters μ\mu and σ^\hat \sigma of the log micro shocks distribution. These parameters determine the limits at large nn. To ascertain how large nqn_q needs to be for Sqt/Sq0MDS_{qt}/S^0_q \approx M_D, refer to Figure 1 below.

Key Observations

  • Empirical fluctuations with an average σ^=0.49\hat \sigma = 0.49 do not diverge as seen with log-Laplace shocks when σ^>0.61\hat \sigma > 0.61.
  • The convergence of the mean for empirical shocks is slower than that for log-normal fluctuations with the same σ^\hat \sigma.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the convergence of means across the range of nqn_q parameters relevant to the problem.

Figures and Analysis

  • Figure 1: Expectation of the log of quantile levels as a function of population nqn_q for various widths of micro shocks σ^\hat \sigma and μ=0\mu = 0. It shows the convergence of mean values to those predicted by the equations for log-normal and log-Laplace shocks, especially when micro log shocks are Gaussian.

    Expectation of Log Quantile Levels vs Population

  • Figure 2: Expectation of the log of quantile levels as a function of μ\mu for various nqn_q and σ^=0.1\hat \sigma = 0.1. This figure highlights the linear dependence of slope 1 in the equations.

    Expectation of Log Quantile Levels vs Mu

  • Figure 3: Expectation of the log of quantile levels as a function of σ^\hat \sigma for various nqn_q and μ=0\mu = 0. It shows the quadratic dependence in log-normal shocks and higher-order terms in log-Laplace shocks. The expectation diverges for σ^>0.61\hat \sigma > 0.61.

    Expectation of Log Quantile Levels vs Sigma

For detailed computational exercises and guides, refer to the Appendix.